Latest Product Check Results

Season 13, Ep 14 - Disaster Survival Kits

Season 13, Ep 14 - Disaster Survival Kits
Share
 

Target Product Checks four Disaster Survival Kits – all New Zealand-made and all advertised as being suitable for 4 people, for 3 days.

·The “PREPARE.CO.NZ” kit was cheapest of the 4, at $265.
·Next up is the “READY FOR ANYTHING” Home kit, at $298.
·The “PLAN-2-SURVIVE” backpack survival kit cost us $320.
·While the “SURVIVE IT” kit was the priciest, at $347.44.


We’ll see how well they follow what Civil Defence recommends should be in a getaway kit. We’ll compare the radios and the lighting supplies, and get an expert to assess the first-aid kits. We’ll also compare the food and water and get our Product Check Family to taste-test the food.

So how much of what’s on the Civil Defence checklist were found in our 4 survival kits? For starters, all 4 had torches and radios with batteries, but as for spare batteries, the SURVIVE IT kit had none. Civil Defence also recommends getaway kits have “emergency water”, but two of our four only had water purification tablets. As for toiletries, none of the 4 supplied soap, and only 2 had tissues for toilet paper.

One of the most important items in any survival kit is a battery-powered radio, and whilst all four kits supplied one, we found the SURVIVE IT radio had the clearest reception.

The best lighting was supplied by PREPARE.CO.NZ: a torch, batteries, spares, candles, matches and glow-sticks; and the worst that supplied by READY FOR ANYTHING – just one small battery-free torch, and six glow-sticks.

Another key essential is a good First Aid kit, to patch up any minor injuries you may sustain during the disaster or the clean-up. We asked a St John Ambulance instructor to assess the first aid in all 4 kits, and again the best performer was PREPARE.CO.NZ.

BEN JORGENSEN, ST JOHN AMBULANCE: “It had bandages, it had dressings, it had gloves, it had some saline dressing as well, and for the types of injuries you might be getting in a natural disaster that was going to be able to cover most of the scenarios you might come across.”

The worst was that supplied by PLAN-2-SURVIVE.

BEN JORGENSEN, ST JOHN AMBULANCE: “It had very, very few pieces of material in there that would be of any use in a disaster situation // It didn’t have gloves, it didn’t have bandages… It lacked a lot of essential gear.”

How do our four kits compare when it comes to the bare essentials?
Only 2 supplied ready-to-drink water, with the other 2 solely providing water purification tablets. That said, those 2 kits could provide the most drinking water in total, and READY FOR ANYTHING the least.

As for food, 3 of the 4 kits solely supplied 4 slabs of these extra-long-life, high-energy rations, whose three key ingredients are: enriched flour, vegetable fat, and sugar. READY FOR ANYTHING, meanwhile, contained “Back Country” brand hiking-food.

Our Product Check Family, the Drews thought:
·“The Mayday food had quite a nice flavour. It sort of tasted like an oatmeal shortbread but it was actually very dry.”
·“The Mayday was my least favourite because it was really hard and gluggy in my mouth when I ate it.”
·“The Mainstay rations initially had the most pleasant flavour and it was a bit more moist however the aftertaste was just a little bit too sweet for me.”
·“The Mainstay wasn’t as bad as the other one. but it was really sweet.”
·“The Back Country Food was a mixed bag really.”
·“The beef wrap, for example, was very stodgy and I didn’t really like the texture.” “I really like the muesli and yoghurt. That was quite tasty and had nice bits of apple in it”
·“It was the best out of a bad bunch but if I was starving I could probably eat it.”

READY-FOR-ANYTHING’s “Back Country” food was easily the Drews’ preference.

Combining that score, with: Price, Contents, Radio and First Aid quality, as well as Night-light and Water quantity, and the “PREPARE.CO.NZ”, 4-person, 72-hour Survival Kit wins tonight’s Product Check.

Become a fan of TV3 on Facebook , on Twitter .